| My
Fourth Vital Record
Robert
W. Marlin speaks about the importance of city directories
of yesterday and today.
 |
The
author’s personal genealogical search began with
a successful search of the city directories of Brooklyn
and Boston. |
When asked
which documents comprise the category of vital records, not
all professional genealogists agree. Some name the big three
which are birth, death and marriage records. Others include
divorce records as a fourth. I include a fourth which technically
is neither a municipal nor a true vital record. In my opinion
it is one of the most misunderstood and continuously under-utilized
records available, yet this source can sometimes produce invaluable
information which might not be available in any of the other
records. I am speaking of the city directory. In many cases
the city directory predates the mandatory recording of other
vital records.
According to the preface of the 1870 New York City Directory,
the first city directory in the US was published in 1786,
which makes it almost as old as the nation itself. The 1786
edition listed 846 citizens of the city of New York. By 1870
the number had swelled to over 189,000. By 1880 the number
was 273,000 and by 1890 it was more than 360,000. By 1933,
when the last edition for Manhattan and the Bronx was published,
the numbers had simply become unmanageable. That year, separate
editions were published for the boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens.
These directories were the forerunner of the telephone directory
and supplied a lot more information. City directories are
still published today and they supply more information than
ever. The major publisher today is R. L. Polk & Co. This
company has been in business since 1870 and annually publishes
about 1,000 city directories for cities large and small. In
spite of this rich history of the city directory, I still
find people who have been doing genealogical research for
years and don’t know about the existence of this invaluable
source.
The basic city directory format has changed little over the
years. It still lists such items as the name, occupation,
spouse and home address of the person listed. In many cases
it will supply the name of the company worked for and may
even include separate entries for adult children living at
home. In older directories even death did not stop a person
being listed in the directory. The entry simply changed. The
wife was now listed by her first name and as a “widow
of” the deceased.
Bonus
Information
Like a modern day telephone directory, the front section of
a city directory is filled with valuable information which
many newcomers to genealogy simply skip past. There are special
lists of names which were received too late for normal insertion
in the directory and a list of all persons who have refused
to supply any information. These entries simply list the name
and address along with the notation “refused.”
There is generally a list of abbreviations which are used
in the directory. These abbreviations cover occupations, products
and locations.
Some have a list of physicians and some have a list of nurses.
Remember that in the 1800s the term nurse and midwife were
sometimes used interchangeably. Black people are also listed,
with the word “colored” added to the other information.
Some directories have street maps which contain approximate
political subdivisions such as wards. Others have lists of
streets and avenues and give house numbers falling between
two parallel streets.
Some contain warnings to check all variant spellings of the
surname you are looking for. The surname Allan could be also
found under Allen or Allyn. Shafer could be found under Schaffer,
Schaefer, Shaefer, Scheffer or even Scheffer. Even a simple
name like Smith could be found under Smyth or Smythe.
Historical Snapshots
To me, researching in an old city directory is also a little
like looking backward at history. A comparison of the 1870
and the 1890 city directories for New York City will give
you an idea what I am talking about. Included right alongside
the rich and famous are many of our ordinary ancestors. As
a genealogist it is your job to find them. There were also
many unusual occupations listed such as Ostler, Rockman, Currier,
Scourer, Lather, Sawyer, Wharfinger, Wheelwright, Cooper and
Poulterer. In the 1870 edition there are listings for John
D. Rockefeller who just that year had started the Standard
Oil Company. His success redefined wealth. Orlando and Riker
Rockefeller were both painters living on Varick Street. Cornelius
Vanderbilt was already a legend, though few knew about Cornelius
Vanderbilt the janitor, who was also listed. The Teddy Roosevelt
listed is not the future president of the US. It is however,
Teddy’s father, who operated a family importing business.
Teddy was only about 12 at this time and probably had little
inkling that he would one day be president of the US. More
on Teddy later. There is a listing for a man named James Gordon
Bennett, Jr. He was the publisher of the New York Herald and
was responsible for sending Henry M. Stanley to Africa to
find Dr. Livingston. The rest is history. And last but not
least, Phineas T. Barnum lived at 438 Fifth Avenue. His plan
to have the circus come to town was about to start. Barnum
did not live to see his circus merge to form the Barnum and
Bailey circus.
The 1890 City Directory for New York City also had many interesting
listings. These include, once again, John D. Rockefeller who
is now listed as “pres.” Cornelius Vanderbilt
is now the president of Grand Central Station and Theodore
Roosevelt is now the US Civil Service Commissioner. He is
now less than 12 years away from becoming president upon the
assassination of President McKinley.
 |
City
directories provide early glimpses at the lives of such
famous names as Barnum, Bennett, Rockefeller, Roosevelt
and Vanderbilt. |
Research
Techniques
Using the city directory for research is not an exact science.
It is necessary to use both conjecture and imagination. Don’t
get hung up on conflicting information from other vital records.
This includes the spelling of surnames or given names. The
street or house could also be wrong. Remember that like census
reports, the information which went into city directories
was received verbally. The person recording it generally recorded
it phonetically which left a lot of room for error.
When properly used, the information in city directories can
lead you to many other sources of information. For example,
the year a person is first listed in a city directly may give
you some clue as to when they arrived in the US. If an ancestor’s
first entry in a city directory is 1908 you might look through
passenger arrival indexes starting with 1905. If you know
they became a citizen, the 1908 entry might be a clue as to
when to start looking for naturalization records. If your
ancestor had grown children living at home for a number of
years and they stopped appearing in the directory this could
be a sign that they had either passed away or left home to
get married. It would be a good idea to check marriage indexes
or death indexes.
The address your ancestors live at during federal census years
is especially important. The US federal census has been conducted
every 10 years since 1790. Knowing the address your ancestor
was living at in 1870, 1880, 1900, 1910 or 1920 can help you
to locate them in the census. Although there is an index for
some of these census years, it is not as accurate as it could
be. If you have tried to find you ancestors in the census
and failed, you may be able to locate them using their street
address. Learning to interpret the information in the directory
is important. Some older directories even told you that the
person lived in a boarding house, when they moved to another
city or when they changed jobs. The possibilities are endless.
My personal experience working with city directories has been
great. It was the 1933 Brooklyn city directory which started
my genealogical search more than 20 years ago. The Boston
Public Library was the source for my city directory hunt for
the Wild family in Boston. I was able to track the family
in the Boston area of Roxbury from 1874 to 1888. Following
the Kruse family though the Brooklyn City Directory was also
a success. At the time this research was done, quality copy
machines were simply not available and it was impossible to
make quality copies from the film. Later, when searching for
the Meyer Korris family in Buffalo I was able to track the
family for many years. The only clue I had was the verbal
statement that Meyer had moved to Buffalo sometime around
1914. I didn’t know that Meyer’s father, Hyman,
(my great-grandfather) was then also living with him, but
the directory showed them at the same address. This was a
bonus. Hyman is last listed in 1921, and it appears that he
may have passed away or gone to live with one of his other
children. In this case, I later discovered that Hyman had
moved back to New York City and lived with the family of his
daughter, Hilda Korris Margolin, who was my maternal grandmother.
The various entries also included the business name and address.
The business name of “Korris & Herring” had
some family significance. I was already aware that Meyer was
married to a lady whose maiden name was Sarah Herring and
that Nathan was Meyer’s brother-in-law. At the time
this research was done, it was not necessary to go any further have three sections. The first is the regular city directory
which lists people by name, address and occupation. The second
section is broken down alphabetically or numerically by street
address and then the name and address of the resident. The
third section is a list of listed phone numbers sorted by
than I did.
The use of more modern city directories is just as helpful,
though with less historical impact. Newer directories have
even more information. Most recent R. L. Polk Directories
exchange. Naturally section three is of little help if the
person has an unlisted number. These directories are especially
helpful in locating relatives who have moved to other cities
or just dropped out of sight.
Many libraries throughout the US have older city directories
for their respective area. The current editions are not usually
in the genealogy department as they are considered business
directories. The LDS Church has hundreds of these directories
on microfilm and makes them available to their Family History
Centers. Many FHC also have selected local directories on
permanent loan. Almost any city directory can be ordered from
the Family History Library in Salt Lake City and viewed at
your local FHC. The best way to do this is to spend a little
time searching through the CD-ROM index of library holdings
and picking out the city or cities you are interested in.
Speaking of CD-ROMS, a new digital collection will soon make
thousands of city directories readily available to genealogists
everywhere. Heritage Quest, of Bountiful, Utah, formed a partnership
some time ago with the New England Historic Genealogical Society
and the Spokane, Washington Public Library. The purpose was
to film on microfiche the entire city directory collection
held by the latter two partners. The number of directories
is staggering. Between NEHGS and the SPL, the combined collection
consists of about 10,000 directories.
States in this collection include Massachusetts, Vermont,
Connecticut, New York, Idaho, California and Washington. The
collection includes both large and small cities. Some of the
larger cities include Bangor, Boston, Bridgeport, Burlington,
Cambridge, Hartford, Los Angeles, New Haven, New London, Oakland,
Pasadena, Sacramento, San Diego, Spokane and Twin Falls. The
filming of approximately 5,000 of these directories has been
completed.
The earliest date available is 1789 and the latest is in the
1960s. The best part is that you will be able to order only
the pages you choose. At the present time only the Massachusetts
directories are available in complete catalog form. However,
listings can be provided for other areas which have been completed.
For more information contact Heritage Quest, P.O. Box 329,
Bountiful, UT 84011-0329; tel. 800-760-2455; fax 801-298-5468;
e-mail: sales@heritagequest.com.
This
article originally appeared in the March/April 1998 issue
of Family Chronicle.
|